Updated: Jan 18
Have you suddenly decided to switch careers and become a clairvoyant? No, of course not. So, what do I mean when I say that brand communities can help you predict the future? Well in this article I will be delving into the subject of what they are, how they have formed and their relevance to relationship marketing. You’ll go beyond the simple dichotomy of active and inactive members and find out how to cater to all members of your brand community. Want to find out more? Then just keep reading.
What is a brand community?
A brand community is created when individuals “voluntarily join and retain their membership while deriving benefits from participating in the community (Kim, Choi, Qualls, & Han, 2008 cited in Mousavi, Roper, & Keeling, 2017, p. 377). Relationships are formed within this community between the brand and community members, between community members and the business that sells the brand and between community members who use the brand (McAlexander, Schouten, & Koening, 2002, p. 38). These communities are important to a business because they play a “vital role in enhancing and building brand loyalty, improving market penetration, generating positive word of mouth, and creating interest in products” (Armstrong & Hagel, 1996, cited in Hajli, Shanmugam, Papagiannidis, Zahay, & Richard, 2017, p. 137). If the aim is to improve market penetration (the percentage of the total estimated market for a product/service) and generate positive word of mouth are all community members created equal? Much like with all online activity (e.g. social media) there are two types of users: posters (active or interactive members) and lurkers (passive or noninteractive members) (Preece, Nonnecke, & Andrews, 2004; Ridings, Gefen, & Arinze, 2006 cited in Mousavi, Roper, & Keeling, 2017, p. 380). So, which one do you want to have? Do both serve a purpose?
Active Members vs Inactive Members
Active members typically get involved in the community and identify more strongly with it because they learn the social rules through trial and error. Generally, they are involved in the community in “a wide variety of ways [through] aﬀective, behavioural and cognitive engagement” (Dessart et al., 2015 cited in Veloutsou & Black, p.3). Inactive members will learn about to interact within the community by vicarious observation (read: voyeuristic behaviour) of other group members. They are typically less emotionally invested in the community and therefore have a lesser attachment or sense of belongingness.
Level of interaction
Community involvement as we’ve seen is largely defined by the level of interaction in the said community. There are different levels of involvement that go beyond the simple active member/lurker dynamic. These have been defined by Azar, Machado, Vacas-de-carvalho, & Mendes, A., (2016) as brand detached, brand proﬁteers, brand companions or brand reliants.
Most commonly referred to as lurkers who don’t assign much value to the online presence of the brand. You won’t find them liking, commenting or sharing the brands content (Azar et al., 2016, p. 168-169).
Main motivation: to being entertained
Best marketing appeal: videos that are funny or evoke an emotional response
Mostly considered the “what’s in it for me” members of the community they respond well to content “about events, posts containing announcements about special offers, posts that explicitly promote the brand’s products and posts related to special dates” (Azar et al., 2016, p. 170).
Main motivation: to gain rewards
Best marketing appeal: photos that are information or reward oriented (e.g. special deals, promos, etc)
Most commonly these members are part of the community in order to gain a sense of connection with other like-minded individuals. They often have other friends or associates that are already part of the community. They engage in order “to express themselves through the association with the brand” (Azar et al., 2016, p. 171).
Main motivation: to increase social influence
Best marketing appeal: videos or photos that encourage social interaction (e.g. online events, community games, etc)
Most commonly considered brand ambassadors or advocates due to their enthusiasm and commitment towards the brand (Azar et al., 2016, p. 172). They are the most active members of the brand community. They want to know more about the brand and are highly responsive to the brands content.
Main motivation: to gain information and be entertained
Best marketing appeal: shareable videos or photos (e.g. ask their opinion and actively demonstrate taking that advice onboard)
Virtual brand community engagement
So let’s rewind a little and first see how a brand community is developed. Then we can look into how we can go about ensuring maximum engagement in a brand community. Brand community engagement is a two-step process:
Firstly, the member initiation stage and secondly, the full membership stage.
Figure 1 Virtual brand community engagement practice (From Tang, 2010 in Hollebeek, Juric, and Tan, 2017, p. 210)
Member Initiation Phase
This is the stage where everything is all shiny, new and exciting. In this stage, individuals are met with a greeting (i.e. made to feel welcome) and regulating occurs (i.e. the ground rules are set, and everyone is made clear about how things work around here). This is where community members learn the customs and norms of the community in order to avoid embarrassment, miscommunication or disagreements in future (De Valck et al., 2009 cited in Hollebeek, Juric and Tan, 2017, p. 209).
Full Member Phase
This is the stage where members will be assisted (given pointers on community and non-community related issues), appreciated (i.e. recognised for their contribution to the community), empathized with (i.e. shown support, consideration or understanding in relation to community or non-community related issues, mingle (i.e. network or make friends), celebrated (i.e. where significant moments for individual community members, the community as a whole or the brand will be celebrated) and ranked (i.e. according to their individual contributions to the maintenance and growth of the community) (Hollebeek, Juric and Tan, 2017, p. 210).
Regardless of what type of community member they or what stage they are in the engagement process we must never lose sight of three very important things that a brand must build and maintain in order to ensure the longevity of the brand community. Given that a brand community is built upon relationship-building, trust, ensuring satisfaction and engendering commitment it is paramount that there be give-and-take (Palmatier et al.,2006 cited in Hajli, et al., 2017, p. p. 137). One-sided or unequal relationships lack longevity and are very hard to retrieve once problems arise. When we talk about relationship marketing we are referring to how “to identify, establish, maintain, enhance and, when necessary, terminate relationships with customers and other stakeholders” (Hajlia et al., 2017, p. 137). To delve into this subject we’ll explore three key elements: relational antecedents, relationship quality and, business share.
Figure 2 Relationship quality as higher-order construct (Vieira, Winklhofer, & Ennew, 2014, p. 95)
Before we can even look into what makes a good relationship we need to see what precedes the relationship. You must first ensure that there mutual goals where “both parties work as equals toward a common long-term aim” (Vieira et al., 2014, p.91). You must also ensure that there is effective communication and by this, I mean timely, relevant, regular and designed to extend the conversation (Adjei, Noble & Noble, 2012, p. 24). You must also ensure that your customer is able to accurately perceive your “level of technical knowledge and ability to demonstrate [that] knowledge (Boles et al. 2000; Palmer and Bejou 1994 cited in Vieira et al., 2014, p.93). Lastly, you must ensure that your customer is able to perceive both economic returns and social gains from associating with your brand in order to ensure the highest relational value (Hennig-Thurau, Gwinner, & Gremler 2002 cited in (Vieira et al., 2014, p.91).
Once we’ve covered all our bases with mutual goals, effective communication, clearly demonstrated our domain expertise and ensured the maximum relational value we are very much on the way to ensuring a good quality relationship. Trust, a key building block in a good relationship, is based on the “perception of the competence, integrity, and benevolence” (Akrout & Nagy, 2018, p. 941). Building upon this we have satisfaction where your customer feels that you are meeting their needs for economic returns and social gains in a satisfactory manner. Lastly, we have commitment, which is defined as the “psychological attachment toward the online service provider, along with his/her willingness to maintain the customer–ﬁrm relationship” (Akrout & Nagy, 2018, p. 941).
Share of business
This is an objective performance measure. It is the portion of the total market (for the product or service you sell) that you effectively control. This is calculated based on sales revenue “where sales of the firm are compared to sales of all of the competitors in the firm’s market” (Swisky, 2004, p.1). We are therefore evaluating the “combined sales of all competitor firms [as being the] total demand for products or services [in a specific] market” (Swisky, 2004, p.1). Your rank on this market is determined by your share of the market. Your ability to meet the relational antecedents and develop a high-quality relationship is incredibly important to this market share.
Need some help with your digital marketing or social media management?
For more on trust: click here
For more on brand strategy: click here
For more on stakeholder engagement: click here
So, you’ve seen that you don’t need a sixth sense in order to understand brand communities. You’ve seen what they are, the diverse needs of community members and how best to interact with them according to their motivations. We’ve explored the process of brand community creation, development, and maintenance. But also you’ve seen how relational antecedents and relational quality can predict your market share. You don’t need to change careers or develop any special powers you simply need to devote greater energy to the relationships you have with your stakeholders and they will provide you valuable insights on your brands future.
Adjei, M. T., Noble, C. H., & Noble, S. M., 2012, ‘Enhancing relationships with customers through online brand communities’, MIT Sloan Management Review, vol. 53, iss. 4, pp. 22-24, viewed 01 July 2019, http://ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/docview/1023761982?accountid=14205
Akrout, H. & Nagy, G. 2018, ‘Trust and commitment within a virtual brand community: The mediating role of brand relationship quality’, Information & Management, vol. 55, iss. 8, pp. 939-955, viewed 01 July 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.04.009
Azar, S. L., Machado, J. C., Vacas-de-Carvalho, L., & Mendes, A., 2016, ‘Motivations to interact with brands on facebook - towards a typology of consumer-brand interactions’, Journal of Brand Management, vol. 23, iss. 2, pp. 153-178, viewed 01 July 2019, doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/10.1057/bm.2016.3
Chen, X., Li, X. Yao, D. & Zhou, Z., 2019, ‘Seeking the support of the silent majority: are lurking users valuable to UGC platforms?’, Original Empirical Research, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, viewed 01 July 2019, https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/10.1007/s11747-018-00624-8
Daukseviciute, I. & Simkin, L., 2016, ‘Optimising relationship marketing programmes: a holistic approach’, Journal of Strategic Marketing, vol. 24, iss. 6, pp. 500-518, viewed 01 July 2019, DOI: 10.1080/0965254X.2015.1063681
Gibbs, J.L., Kim, H., & Ki, S., 2019, ‘Investigating the Role of Control and Support Mechanisms in Members’ Sense of Virtual Community’, Communication Research, vol. 46, iss. 1, pp. 117–145, viewed 01 July 2019, https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/10.1177/0093650216644023
Hajli, N., Shanmugam, M., Papagiannidis, S., Zahay, D., & Richard, M.-O., 2017, ‘Branding co-creation with members of online brand communities’, Journal of Business Research, vol. 70, pp. 136-144, viewed 01 July 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.026
Hakala, H., Niemi, L. & Kohtamaki, M., 2017, ‘Online brand community practices and the construction of brand legitimacy’, Marketing Theory, vol. 17, iss. 4, pp. 537-558, viewed 01 July 2019, doi: 10.1177/1470593117705695
Hollebeek, L.D., Juric, B. & Tang, W. 2017, ‘Virtual brand community engagement practices: a refined typology and model’, The Journal of Services Marketing, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 204-217, viewed 01 July 2019, doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/10.1108/JSM-01-2016-0006
Horng, S., 2016, ‘A study of active and passive user participation in virtual communities’, Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 17, iss. 4, pp. 289-311, viewed 01 July 2019, http://ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/docview/1927755108?accountid=14205
Mahrous, A. A., & Abdelmaaboud, A. K., 2017, ‘Antecedents of participation in online brand communities and their purchasing behavior consequences’, Service Business, vol. 11, iss. 2, pp. 229-251, viewed 01 July 2029, doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/10.1007/s11628-016-0306-5
McAlexander, J. H., Schouten, J. W., & Koening, H. F., 2002, ‘Building brand community’, Journal of Marketing, vol. 66, iss. 1, pp. 38-54, viewed 01 July 2019, doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/10.1509/jmkg.22.214.171.12451
Meek, S., Ogilvie, M., Lambert, C., & Ryan, M.M., 2019, ‘Contextualising social capital in online brand communities’, Journal of Brand Management, vol. 26, iss. 4, pp. 426–444, viewed 01 Jul 2019, https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/10.1057/s41262-018-00145-3
Mousavi, S., Roper, S. & Keeling, K.A. 2017, ‘Interpreting Social Identity in Online Brand Communities: Considering Posters and Lurkers’, Psychology & Marketing, vol. 34, iss. 4, pp. 376-393, viewed 01 July 2019, https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/10.1002/mar.20995
Niedermeier, A. Albrecht, L. & Jahn, B. 2019, ‘ “Happy Together”: Effects of Brand Community Engagement on Customer Happiness”, Journal of Relationship Marketing, vol. 18, iss. 1, pp. 54-76, viewed 01 July 2019, DOI: 10.1080/15332667.2018.1534063
Pasternak, O., Veloutsou, C., & Morgan-Thomas, A., 2017, ‘Self-presentation, privacy and electronic word-of-mouth in social media’, The Journal of Product and Brand Management, vol. 26, iss. 4, pp. 415-428, viewed 01 July 2019, doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/10.1108/JPBM-04-2016-1150
Schau, H. J., Muñiz, A. M., Jr, & Arnould, E. J., 2009, ‘How brand community practices create value’, Journal of Marketing, vol. 73, iss. 5, pp. 30-51, viewed 01 July 2019, doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/10.1509/jmkg.73.5.30
Shen, X,-L., Li, Y.-J., Sun, Y., & Zhou, Y., 20018, ‘Person-environment fit, commitment, and customer contribution in an online brand community: A nonlinear model’, Journal of Business Research, vol. 85, pp. 117-126, viewed 01 July 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.007
Swirsky, S. 2004, ‘The implications of market share changes on the market's pricing of earnings’, Dissertation, The Florida State University, http://ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/docview/305182881?accountid=14205
Taute, H. A., Sierra, J. J., Carter, L. L., & Maher, A. A., 2017, ‘A sequential process of brand tribalism, brand pride and brand attitude to explain purchase intention: A cross-continent replication study’, The Journal of Product and Brand Management, vol. 26, is. 3, pp. 239-250, viewed 01 July 2019, doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/10.1108/JPBM-08-2016-1289
Ul Islam, J. & Rahman, Z., 2017, ‘The impact of online brand community characteristics on customer engagement: An application of Stimulus-Organism-Response paradigm’, Telematics & Informatics, vol. 34, iss. 4, pp. 96-109, viewed 01 July 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.01.004
Veloutsou, C. & Black, I., n.d., ‘Creating and managing participative brand communities: The roles members perform’, Journal of Business Research, pp. 1-13, viewed 01 July 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.032
Vieira, A.L., Winklhofer, H., & Ennew, C., 2014, ‘The Effects of Relationship Marketing on Share of Business: A Synthesis and Comparison of Models’, Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, vol. 21, iss. 2, pp. 85-110, viewed 01 July 2019, doi:10.1080/1051712X.2014.903455
#MarketingCollectiveInsights #digitalmarketing #mobilemarketing #socialmediamarketing #contentmarketing #brandcommunityidentity #brandlegitimacy #brandattachment #consumerengagement #brandcommunityroles #Virtualbrandcommunityengagementprocess #hottoguide